Tuesday, May 26, 2015

A night of deep darkness.
On a branch of the old fig tree
A frog croaks without cease,
Predicting a storm, a deluge,
and I am drowned in fear.

It is night,

And with night the world seems
like a corpse in the grave;
And in fear I say to myself:
'What if torrential rain falls everywhere?'
'What if the rain does not stop
until the earth sinks into the water
like a small boat?'

In this night of awful darkness

Who can say in what state we will be
when dawn breaks?
Will the morning light make
the frightening face of the storm
disappear?

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

The Hudson Yards project, on Manhattan's west side, is the largest private real estate development in the U.S. Nothing of this scale has been done in New York City since Rockefeller Center was constructed in the 1930s.
Hudson Yards will create 17 million square feet of commercial, residential and retail development over a total of 28 acres with 5,000 new residences and 100 new shops. A new subway stop, a new public school and a new luxury hotel are also on the way. The first commercial tower — the 52-story Ten Hudson Yards — will open in early 2016. It will be home to major brands such as Coach, SAP and L’Oreal.
Now here’s the catch: Most of the project is being built on a platform above an existing and fully operational train yard.
It’s been a challenge to the property’s developer, privately-held Related Companies. Because foundations can be put in between tracks, the train tracks determine what can be built and where. “That may or may not be the right place for for our building so it gets a little complicated,” Jay Cross, president of Related Hudson Yards, tells Yahoo Finance Editor-in-Chief Andy Serwer in the accompanying video. There are a total of 30 tracks in the yards and Related can only shut down four tracks at a time to work. “After years of great planning for this, it’s basically been a military operation,” he says. 
And it has been years.  Related was selected as the project’s developer in May 2008. “Then the world fell apart in October,” says Cross, alluding to the onset of the financial crisis. “But it actually worked to our advantage,” he says. The company used that time to complete municipal and other approvals. By the time the U.S. was coming out of the recession, Cross says, Related signed its first major tenant, Coach. Construction began in the fall of 2011.
The project is still in its first phase, being built over the Eastern Rail Yards. By 2017, phase two will begin over the Western Rail Yards closer to the Hudson River where eight more buildings will go up, mostly residential. Related hopes to complete the project by “the mid 2020s.”
The price tag of the Hudson Yards project is upwards of $20 billion. “We use just about every kind of financing,” Cross says. “Just because the volume of dollars is so great that you have to go after every source.”  Among the financing methods Related has turned to is the federal government’s controversial EB-5 program where individuals from overseas can invest as part of a path to legal residency. Related has raised more than $600 million in the program so far.
Here’s how it works: Foreign individuals invest between $500,000 and $1 million in a project that will create at least 10 jobs per investor. The EB-5 program was created by Congress in 1990 and has garnered support from the likes of Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and Sheldon Adelson.  But numerous reports of fraud have surfaced related to the program and there is a growing push to reform. Nevertheless, it’s become a hot source for real estate financing.
Cross says EB-5 is just one avenue Related has used to secure funds. “You go to every bank. You go to non-banks, you go to sovereign wealth funds, you go to other equity investors, so I think virtually every type of real estate investor in the world, either we're going to them or they're coming to us,” he says. “EB-5 is one part of that and it's been very successful for us.”
Cross says other investors and consortiums of banks will make up the balance of the required financing.
The Hudson Yards development has been years in the making.  A little more than a decade ago, then-NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg's nearly four-year quest to build a football stadium in the area was voted down. The plan was supposed to spark the redevelopment of the West Side and lure the 2012 Olympics to New York. Of course, that didn’t happen. There was also a failed effort to move the Yankees to the West Side in the 1990s.
But this isn’t just a New York story. Cross says projects like Hudson Yards are “advancing the cause of cities.” According to the United Nations, 54% of the world’s population lives in urban areas. That figure is expected to increase to 66% by 2050.

“That's where you get upward mobility," Cross says. "That's where the jobs are that can enhance the quality of life... We hope to pioneer things here in Hudson Yards which we can do on scale and then roll them out in lots of other cities.”
Editor's Note: An earlier version of this article appeared with an incorrect title for Jay Cross. He is president of Related Hudson Yards, not Hudson Related Yards.  Also, 17 million square feet includes residential space in addition to commercial and retail space as the earlier version indicated.  This piece has been updated.

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

 
 
image
 
 
 
 
 
New Research: Can Our Brain Repair Itself?
Brain damage increases with age, leading to many terrible diseases. But can our brains repair themselves, with a little help?
Preview by Yahoo
 

New Research: Can Our Brain Repair Itself?794 views

Our brain is the one thing we can never replace. Even at our most wild medical fantasies, like recently with the body transplant, we know we cannot replace our brains. Brains get damaged over time, leading to dementia, Alzheimer's disease and many other terrible conditions. But can the brain repair itself, and can we help it? This fascinating talk will update you on the most recent developments in the field.

Monday, May 11, 2015

Antioxidant-Rich Berries Beyond Blueberries

Food NetworkMay 8, 2015
Antioxidant-Rich Berries Beyond Blueberries
By Kiri Tannenbaum
Blueberries are hopefully already on the list of superfoods incorporated into your weekly diet. Juicy and sweet, blueberries contain high levels of antioxidants and lower blood pressure, and 2/3 cup of these gems delivers 14 percent of your daily fiber. Recent studies also show they may reduce the risk of breast cancer, improve cardiovascular health and slow down cognitive decline in the elderly.
But don’t limit yourself to the magical blueberry. Berries from strawberries to chokeberries are excellent sources for antioxidants and polyphenols — micronutrients that research shows prevent degenerative diseases. Here are five berries you can try right now that pack a nutritious punch like the almighty blueberry.

Goji 
Benefits: Native to China, these nutrient-dense berries have been used for thousands of years in Chinese medicine for their high levels of vitamin A, vitamin B and iron as well as powerful carotenoids, which preserve eyesight and prevent macular degeneration.

Taste: Raw, the goji berry may be a shock to the system. Some describe the flavor as bitter and others as a cross between a cherry and a cranberry, with more of the tartness of the latter. Dried, it is a bit sweeter and more pleasant-tasting. Stick with the dried.

Best In: Goji Berry Trail Mix
image
Acai
Benefits: The beautiful palm trees of the Amazon can be credited for the antioxidant-rich acai berry. While some believe the acai berry wards off arthritis and cancer, reduces cholesterol and speeds up weight loss, there is no evidence to support those claims. It is known, however, that the berries contain omega-9, a fatty acid and powerful anti-inflammatory, and have antioxidant levels higher than cranberries, raspberries, blackberries, strawberries or blueberries.

Taste: The berry is delicious on its own, and Brazilians guzzle its juice or use it in fruit smoothies. Often it’s sold as frozen pulp; adding a little sweetness with honey, agave or maple syrup will bring out the flavor.

Acai Breakfast Bowl
From Food Network Kitchen
Ingredients
Two 4-ounce packets unsweetened frozen acai puree
1 medium banana
½ cup blueberries
1 tablespoon honey
3 tablespoons granola
2 tablespoons pomegranate seeds
1 tablespoon unsweetened coconut flakes

Directions
Break the frozen acai up a little by slapping the sealed packets on the countertop or hitting them with a meat mallet. Blend the berries with ½ the banana, ¼ cup of the blueberries and the honey in the blender, stopping to stir and break up the mixture as needed, until it’s the consistency of a thick smoothie; transfer to a cereal bowl.
Slice the remaining ½ banana. Arrange the slices, the remaining ¼ cup blueberries, granola, pomegranate seeds and coconut flakes in neat piles or rows on top of the acai. Then take a photo!
Frozen acai puree can be found online or in specialty food stores.
Per serving (1 bowl): Calories: 400; Fat: 10 g (Saturated: 4.5 g); Cholesterol: 0 mg; Sodium: 30 mg; Carbohydrate: 78 g; Fiber: 11 g; Protein: 5 g; Sugar: 44 g
Copyright 2015 Television Food Network, G.P. All rights reserved.

image
Mulberry
Benefits: Not a fan of the banana? Eat 10 mulberries and you’ll be getting 29 grams of potassium, which reduces the risk of stroke and heart disease, boosts bone density and ensures that your muscles, including your brain, are working properly.

Taste: A close cousin to the blackberry, mulberries are deep purple, red or white. When ripe, the mulberry is a balance of sweet and tart, but when overly ripe they lack flavor.

Best In: Mixed Berry Smoothie
image
Chokeberry 
Benefits: Like the other members of the berry family, the chokeberry has one of the highest levels of polyphenolic compounds, which scientists have praised.

Taste: The chokeberry, also known as aronia berry, grows wild in Montana and Idaho. The raw berries are not as appealing, which may be why they are used in ornamental decorations. But prepared in jams and jellies they are sweet goodness. If you can get your hands on fresh chokeberries, use them in a basic compote recipe and enjoy it with lean meats or as a spread on whole-grain toast.

Best In: Berry Compote
image
Maqui
Benefits: The maqui berry is being hailed as the super-est of super berries for its score on the Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) test, which measures antioxidant levels. Its unusually high level of delphinidins — antioxidants believed to inhibit the growth of cancer cells — places it above all other berries. The berry is native to the Chilean rainforests, and it has anti-inflammatory properties that offer protection from damaging free radicals. Studies have shown maqui’s effects on insulin levels may also help prevent diabetes. Besides being beneficial for the inside of your body, this berry is touted for being rich in vitamin C, which contributes to maintaining healthy skin.

Taste: In the United States, the maqui berry is most commonly found in powder form — perfect for smoothies and adding a slight tartness. But the taste is hard to detect. If you get a chance to enjoy the berries fresh, you’ll find them to be bursting with sweetness.

Friday, May 8, 2015

Know the Early Signs of Alzheimer's Disease

 
There are two types of people in this world. Those who want to know when something is wrong with them or the ones they love, and those that prefer to ignore the problem. The first is harder, much harder. It means facing the truth head on and taking your lumps, whatever they may be.
The alternative is easier, at first, but the repercussions of avoiding early detection mean a much more rapid slide into dementia, without drugs that can slow the disease down and enhance functioning. True, there is no final cure for the disease just yet, but early detection can give a much longer time with low to no symptoms. 
Don't be alarmed if you feel like you have one or two of these symptoms, they may have different causes such as natural aging. But this should be a list you're aware of, especially if they persist or worsen.
Click on the image to see it in full size.
10 warning signs of alzheimer's

Monday, May 4, 2015

Pedophilia

News Pedophilia is a Cornerstone of Islam

Pedophilia is a Cornerstone of Islam

Child molestation is not only widespread throughout the Muslim world, but is completely accepted as a standard practice by Muslim men. In fact, in 2012, Pentagon lawyers, at the request of the Obama administration drafted an Army manual which forbade any criticism of child molestation by troops serving in Muslim countries.
The 75-page handbook stated troops should avoid “making derogatory comments about the Taliban, advocating women’s rights, any criticism of pedophilia, directing any criticism towards Afghans, mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct” or “anything related to Islam,” Judicial Watch reported.
Of course, when speaking on the topic of pedophilia in Islamic culture, one cannot ignore the original ‘chomo’ (prison slang for child molester)…the prophet himself, Muhammad.
Muhammad married his bride, Aisha at age six, but reportedly waited until she was 9-years-old to deflower the youngster.
In 2011, Muslim cleric Dr. Salih bin Fawzan tried to rationalize Muhammad’s criminal behavior in the following (rather laughable text):
The story of the prophet’s marriage to Aisha reveals to us aspects like the prophet’s conduct with Aisha, and more importantly the aspect regarding the relationship between the husband and wife, to show how one should treat his wife, just as the prophet did with Aisha.
We know that Asia’s mother went to take her down from the swing that she was playing on to fix her hair and prepare her for the prophet so he could enter her [have sex with her]—and she did that all on the same day.
It gets even more sickening…
So you see, she was playing with her fellow playmates even though her day of consummation was that very same day—and all that they did was to fix her up for the prophet so he could have sex with her.
Now what do we see when the prophet married Aisha? Did he go to her and say “Okay that’s it, you’re married, you’re now a grown up, you’re supposed to be mature, you need to do this and that; you need to forget about your toys and your little friends; you are now a wife of a man, you have to see to my needs” and that’s it?
No. The prophet allowed her to continue playing with her toy dolls—indeed, the prophet even sometimes gave her such things to play with.
This same Saudi cleric issued a fatwa stating that there should be no minimum requirement age for girls to marry, “even if they are in the cradle,” and simply that “they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men.”
And, in the tradition of the pedophile prophet, several so-called ‘moderate Muslim’ countries have no minimum age for girls to marry, these include: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Yemen.
Several years ago, the minimum age for marriage in Yemen was 15, but that was abolished in 1999. Unofficially, Yemeni clerics agreed that puberty begins at the age of nine, therfore that is when husbands should begin having sex with their child brides, according to a Human Rights Watch report.
 Read more at http://universalfreepress.com/pedophilia-cornerstone-islam/

how much income is taxed




OECD tax burdens on wages rising without tax rate increases

 
14/04/2015 - Taxes on wages have risen by about 1 percentage point for the average worker in OECD countries between 2010 and 2014 even though the majority of governments did not increase statutory income tax rates, according to a new OECD report.
Taxing Wages 2015 says the tax burden has increased in 23 OECD countries and fallen in 10 during this period.
Most of the increased tax resulted from wages has resulted from wages rising faster than tax allowances and credits. In 2014, only seven countries had higher statutory income tax rates for workers on average earnings than in 2010, and in six countries they were lower.
In 2014, the tax burden on the average worker across the OECD increased by 0.1 of a percentage point to 36.0%, even though no OECD country increased its statutory income tax rates on the average worker. The tax burden increased in 23 of the 34 OECD countries, fell in nine and remained unchanged in two.
Taxing Wages 2015, provides  cross-country comparative data on income tax paid by employees as well as the associated social security contributions made by employees and employers; both are key factors when individuals consider their employment options and businesses make hiring decisions.
The tax and social security contribution burden is measured by the ‘tax wedge’ - or the total taxes paid by employees and employers, minus family benefits received as a percentage of the total labour costs of the employer.
This year’s report contains a special chapter on labour income in five major non-OECD economies: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. The analysis shows that there is significant variation between these countries. In 2013, tax wedges in Brazil and China for the average single worker were similar to those observed in many OECD countries.  In contrast, employees in India, Indonesia and South Africa faced tax wedges that were much lower than in the vast majority of OECD economies.
The mix of labour taxes also varies across these non-OECD countries with social security contributions comprising the bulk of the tax burden measures for the model households that are covered in four of the five countries, with South Africa being the exception.
One of the most striking findings of this analysis is that unlike the vast majority of OECD countries, family payments play very little or no role in reducing the tax burden on workers with children in these non-OECD economies.

Other key findings in the report:

Tax burdens continued to rise in 2014

  • The highest average tax burdens for childless single workers earning the average wage in their country were observed in Belgium (55.6%), Austria (49.4%), Germany (49.3%) and Hungary (49.0%). The lowest were in Chile (7%), New Zealand (17.2%), Mexico (19.5%) and Israel (20.5%).  
  • Across OECD countries the average tax and social security burden on employment incomes increased by 0.1 of a percentage point to 36.0% in 2014.  This followed rises of 0.2, 0.1 and 0.5 percentage points in the three years since 2010. These rises reversed the decline from 36.1% to 35.1% between 2007 and 2010.
  • Personal income taxes were the main contributor to an increasing total tax wedge in 18 of the 23 countries with an increase. The largest increase was in Ireland (+1.1 percentage points) where a higher proportion of earnings was subject to tax as the statutory tax rates, thresholds and basic tax credit amounts remained unchanged since 2011.
  • Personal income taxes and employer social security contributions were the primary factors in countries where the tax wedge fell. The only country with a decline of more than one percentage point was Greece (-1.2 percentage points) due to decreasing employer social security contributions (-0.9 percentage points). The overall employer social security contribution rate was reduced from 27.46% to 24.56% from July 2014.

Tax burdens in families with children

  • The highest tax wedges for one-earner families with two children at the average wage were in Greece (43.4%), Belgium (40.6%) and France (40.5%). New Zealand had the smallest tax wedge for these families (3.8%), followed by Chile (7%), Switzerland (9.8%) and Ireland (9.9%). The average for OECD countries was 26.9%.
  • Due to reduced family income supplement and frozen basic family benefit payments, Ireland saw the largest increase in the tax burden for one earner families with children (+1.5 percentage points) compared with a 1.1 percentage points increase for the single average worker.   
  • In all OECD countries except Chile, Greece and Mexico, the tax wedge for workers with children is lower than that for single workers without children.  The differences are particularly large in the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg and Slovenia. 

Tax burden on labour income in Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa

  • The tax wedge figures for the single average worker in 2013 were between 33% and 34% in Brazil and China (where the modelling focuses on Shanghai); slightly below the OECD average of 35.9%. The corresponding averages in India, Indonesia and South Africa, ranging from zero to 14.3%, were low compared with the vast majority of OECD countries.
  • In Brazil, China, India and Indonesia, the average worker pays little or no income tax and the employer social security contributions component forms 70% to 80% of the tax wedge. In South Africa, the picture is different, where personal income tax as a percentage of total labour costs (11.4%) is just 2 percentage points below the OECD average and comprises around 80% of the total tax wedge.
  • In contrast with the OECD average, the presence of children has little or no effect on the tax burden in these non-OECD countries. In most cases, working families with children face the same tax wedge as their childless counterparts. The exception is Brazil, where the second earner with 33% of the average wage receives the “salário família”, reducing the tax wedge slightly.

Non-tax compulsory payments

In some countries a range of insurance-related benefits are provided through compulsory payments to privately-managed pension funds or insurance companies rather than through payments of social security contributions to government. More information on these “non-tax compulsory payments” is included in the OECD Tax Database.
Further information including the key results, is available at: www.oecd.org/tax/taxing-wages-20725124.htm. This webpage includes "Country notes" for each OECD member country.
Journalists should contact David Bradbury (+33 1 45 24 15 97) or Maurice Nettley (+33 1 45 24 96 17) from the Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, or OECD Media Division (+33 1 45 24 97 00).



Sunday, April 19, 2015

Noam Chomsky: We’re facing a new Cold War

Noam Chomsky: We’re facing a new Cold War

The linguist and philosopher on the warped coverage of Putin's Russia and the ways we whitewash our war crimes                                

                                              
Noam Chomsky: We're facing a new Cold WarEnlargeNoam Chomsky (Credit: AP/Nader Daoud)
This article originally appeared on Jacobin.
Jacobin Earlier this month, Dan Falcone and Saul Isaacson, both high school educators, sat down with Noam Chomsky in his Cambridge, MA office. In a brief conversation, edited and condensed here for clarity, they covered a wide range of topics — the projection of US power abroad and the stories told to justify it; COINTELPRO and domestic repression; the failures of the mainstream media; the West’s posture toward Putin; and much more. As always, we’re happy to publish Professor Chomsky’s invaluable insights.
Dan Falcone
I was recently in correspondence with a good friend of yours, Richard Falk, and we were discussing Juan Cole’s idea of “essentialism” as it pertains to the Muslim world. And this led me to think about how essentialism is present in liberal education.
For instance, take a good and appropriate cause like education for Muslim girls and how they face Taliban oppression. This is important to fight, obviously, but often the struggle is taught without the mentioning of American foreign policy or our own international crimes isolated from the entirety of the phenomenon.  This type of lesson planning in secondary education gets laudatory reviews. Could you help me in contextualizing this?
Noam Chomsky
Well take, say, the Taliban education that comes out of madrassas in Pakistan, and is funded by our main ally, Saudi Arabia, and was supported by the Reagan administration — because it was part of the support of Pakistan, primarily as a war against the Russians.
Well, the United States tried to keep the Russians in Afghanistan, and the goal was very explicitly stated by the CIA station chief in Islamabad, which got around the insurgency. What he said was, we don’t care about the liberation of Afghanistan. We want to kill Russians. A large part of that was to also support the worst dictatorship in Pakistan, the General Zia-ul-Haq dictatorship, who was allowed to develop nuclear weapons.


You Might Also Like

The Reaganites pretended they didn’t know, but of course they did, so that they could keep pouring funds in. The other thing that they were doing was radically “Islamizing” Pakistani society. So, the Saudis are not only the most extreme radical fundamentalists in the Islamic world and our main allies, but also a kind of missionary, and they have plenty of money. They have other wealthy sectors too, but they pour money into building mosques, Quranic schools, and so on. That’s where a lot of the Taliban came from.
So yes, we had a big role in it — plus, it’s worse than that.  I mean if you take a look at the serious history after the Russians withdrew, they left behind the Najibullah government, which was pretty reasonable in many ways. In fact, for women, at least in Kabul and places like that, they’re way better off than they’ve been any time since the Russians.
And the Najibullah government, which was pretty popular, maintained itself until two events took place. 1) The Russians withdrew, pulled out, ended support, and 2) The US maintained support for the mujahideen, who are mostly religious extremists and fundamentalists — guys who throw acid at women if they aren’t wearing the right clothes and so on. And they devastated Kabul, they practically destroyed it. They took over. Their rule was so awful that when the Taliban came in, they were actually welcomed.
Well, that’s part of history too, you know? Plus a lot that’s happened since isn’t very pretty. So yeah, if you want to study the education of the Taliban, these are things to do. And it’s not that we can’t read things, like you can read the story of Malala Yousafzai, which is very evocative.
She talks about the warlord society and so on, which the US instituted. There are other things one could read. I mean, there’s a very good book by Anand Gopal which came out recently. Although he’s pretty sympathetic to the US position, so it’s mostly about what he calls “mistakes” — how the United States essentially reconstructed the Taliban by misunderstanding the society.
But what he describes is very persuasive. He goes through, and he knows the country very well. And he describes in great detail how the gangsters and warlords and criminals manipulated the US forces. Some group would say, you’ve got to attack these guys over there, they happen to be a personal enemy claiming that they’re Taliban supporters. So the US would send in Special Forces and bombers and beat the shit out of everyone — and upgraded Taliban supporters.
Gopal says the Taliban basically withdrew when the US invaded. But then we helped them come back by means like these; through reconstructing the insurgency, which the government now can’t control. 
DF
So, there’s a simultaneous support for the bandits . . .
NC
Part of it was purposeful by the Reagan administration. Part of it is maybe just kind of arrogant ignorance. Assuming we understand how to do things when you know actually nothing about the society and just hit it with a sledgehammer and you end up supporting, maybe inadvertently, the most criminal elements who then are using the sledgehammer for their own purposes. You know, to smash up their personal enemies.
DF
I remember some of your talks after September 11, 2001, you were mentioning how there was a lot of praise for works in the social sciences where authors were reviewing books that would say America’s really only flaw is not doing enough in reaction to other people’s crimes.
NC
It goes on right now. Take a look at the current issue of Middle East JournalIt is one of the more free, open, most critical of professional journals. It’s been pretty good in the past, but there’s a symposium. It’s a large part of the issue, and it includes ambassadors, generals, and all kinds of big shots. They’re discussing the problems in the Middle East, the total chaos and what can we do better than in the past to stabilize the Middle East?
I mean, where did the chaos come from in Iraq and Libya? We did it. But the only question you can ask is how can we perform better in stabilizing the Middle East? Then of course there are these destabilizing elements like Iran, a rogue state, and the greatest threat to world peace. How are they to be stabilized in the Middle East?
If you take a look after the nuclear agreement, immediately there’s a lot of commentary. The New York Times had a front page, a think piece, from one of their big thinkers, Peter Baker. It says basically in agreement, you can’t trust Iran. You know, they destabilize the Middle East, and then he gives a list of reasons — each of them very interesting. But the most interesting is that one of the main crimes of Iran is that they were supporting militias that killed American soldiers.
In other words when we invade and destroy another country, that’s stabilizing, and if someone defends themselves that is destabilizing. That shows up in popular culture like this horrible film American Sniper. Take a look at it. The memoir is worse than the film, but it comes out that the first kill, the one he’s really proud of, is a woman and a child who are holding a grenade when their town is being attacked by American marines.
And they are savages, monsters, we hate them, they have to be murdered, and everybody’s applauding. I mean, even the New York Times arts pages was talking about what a wonderful film it was. It’s just mind-boggling.
DF
Speaking of mind-boggling, and international terror, I wanted to ask about domestic terror. I wanted to ask you about COINTELPRO. It does not get a lot of mentioning in the social science or historical educational curriculum. Can you tell me about COINTELPRO and the importance of teaching and learning about it in the democratic society?
NC
It’s an understatement to say it receives little attention. COINTELPRO was a program by the national political police, the FBI, which is basically what they are. It ran through four administrations, and it was conscious. It began by going after the Communist Party in the 1950s. It then extended into the Puerto Rican independence movement and the American Indian movements, the women’s movement, and the whole New Left. But the main target was the black movement.
It was a major program of disruption and went all the way to direct political assassination. The worst case was Fred Hampton and Mark Clark, who were simply murdered in a gestapo-style attack set up by the FBI. They were very effective black organizers. The FBI didn’t care much about the criminals, but they wanted to go after the effective organizers. It happened to have been exposed in the courts at about the same time as Watergate. I mean, in comparison to this program, Watergate is a tea party, nothing.
I was asked by the New York Review to write a brief article and a symposium when Watergate was exposed. But I had just read about this. I said look, Watergate is showing how famous people receive bad names in private and that shakes the foundation of the republic? And at the very same time you get the exposure of this incredible program, which went all the way to political assassination so it’s far more significant.
DF
The following of the stories that are the petty crimes insulate the powerful from the major crimes.
NC
If you look at yesterday’s New York Times, there’s a very interesting comparison between two stories. One of them is a front-page story, big continuation page. It’s about the journalistic malfeasance found in the Rolling Stone article. It’s a huge statement about terrible reporting. You know, they said the crime was a lack of skepticism, a terrible journalistic crime.
They have another article on Laos, which is quite interesting. It’s about an important woman, a Lao-American woman who’s working on trying to do something about the unexploded bombs that are killing people over in Northern Laos. And it cites a source, the right source, Fred Branfman, and his book, Voices from the Plain of Jars. And that’s where they get their information from.
Then it says, for the United States, the target of the US bombing was the Ho Chi Minh Trail where North Vietnamese were coming to South Vietnam and the Lao collaborators with the North Vietnamese. What are the facts in Fred Branfman’s book? The US was attacking Northern Laos. In fact, it’s shown on the map they were attacking, and it had nothing to do with the Ho Chi Minh Trail, no North Vietnamese.
Why were they doing it? Fred documented it. He quotes Monteagle Stearns, who was asked in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, why are we bombing this remote area of Northern Laos and wiping it out? And he gives the answer. He says there was a bombing halt over North Vietnam. And we had all these planes around and we didn’t have anything to do with them. So we destroyed Northern Laos.
That’s transmuted in the New York Times into straight government propaganda. And that’s an absolutely colossal lie. Is that going to beinvestigated by the Columbia Journalism Review? We’re going to have front-page stories? No. It’s an amazing comparison, and it’s every day.
Saul Isaacson
Stephen Cohen has argued that we’re closer to war with Russia than we have been since the Cuban missile crisis. Do you think he’s overstating the crisis in Ukraine?
NC
I don’t think so. I mean the government of Ukraine that came in after the coup, the parliament, voted almost unanimously to pursue membership in NATO. As Cohen and many others have pointed out, that is something utterly intolerable to any Russian leader. It’s kind of as if the Warsaw Pact had taken over South America and was now going to include Mexico and Canada. So, yeah, that’s serious.
It’s interesting the way Putin is treated. I think it is maybe in the same Middle East Journal I read recently, talking about supporting the US position on the Ukraine, and some serious person saying this will be opposed by North Korea, the Islamic state, and Stephen Cohen. [To question the US position on Ukraine means you will receive threats from] Stalinist apologists and get a bitter pronunciation of dismissal and ridicule.
SI
He also suggests that we’re on the verge of a new Cold War.
NC
It’s serious. I mean, look, Gorbachev agreed to the unification of Germany — and even its incorporation with NATO, which is an amazing concession if you look at history. But there was a quid pro quo: that NATO would “not expand one inch to the east,” that was the phrase, meaning to East Germany.
Once NATO had expanded to East Germany, Gorbachev was infuriated. He was informed by the Bush 41 administration that it was only a verbal promise. It wasn’t on paper, and the implication is if you’re dumb enough to accept a gentleman’s agreement with us, that’s your problem. Then Clinton came in, expanded NATO to the borders of Russia. And now it’s gone further, even to Ukraine which is right at the heart of, apart from historical connections, of Russian geo-strategic concerns. That’s very serious.
SI
And it’s getting so little press, so little coverage in the US.
NC
Not only little coverage but what there is, is insane. I mean it’s all about what a lunatic Putin is. There’s an article in one of the psychology journals about how he must have Asperger’s or some other articles about how he has brain damage. I mean, you can like him or not, but his position is perfectly understandable. 
DF
Finally, can you comment on the Holocaust Memorial and how the museum connects itself to the doctrine of the “Responsibility to Protect?” (R2P) What is America’s interest with R2P or the “Responsibility to Protect?”
NC
The Holocaust Memorial Museum was established in the 1970s, part of a huge expansion of Holocaust studies, memorials, etc. The date is of some significance. The right time would have been decades earlier, but that was before US relations with Israel were established in their current form (after the 1967 war), and inconvenient questions might have been raised about the US’s attitudes towards the Holocaust and particularly towards survivors.
Also striking is the absence of any remotely comparable reaction to enormous US crimes, such as virtual elimination of the indigenous population and the vicious slave labor camps that had an enormous role in the prosperity of the country. The lesson seems to be clear: we can lament the hideous crimes of others, when it is convenient to do so, but only the crimes of others.
As for R2P, there are two versions of the doctrine. One was adopted by the UN General Assembly. Changes from earlier UN resolutions are slight, and crucially, it maintains the essential provisions of the UN Charter barring the use of force without Security Council authorization (or in response to armed attack, irrelevant here).
The second version, in a report by a commission headed by Gareth Evans, is almost the same, but with one crucial difference: it authorizes regional groups to intervene with force within what they take to be their domains without Security Council authorization. There is only one regional group that can act this way: NATO.
So the Evans version essentially allows NATO (meaning the US) to resort to force when it chooses to do so. That is the operative version. Appeal is made to the innocuous UN version to justify the resort to force.
The case that was in everyone’s mind was the NATO attack on Serbia in the Kosovo conflict, bitterly condemned by most of the world but applauded by the NATO countries as a wonderful tribute to their magnificence.
Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor (retired) at MIT. He is the author of many books and articles on international affairs and social-political issues, and a long-time participant in activist movements.

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Bomb Iran? Not now: first Yemen ...



April 10, 2015              
The richest Arab nation, petro-hacienda of the Al-Saud family, with the support of other petro-rogue states of the Cooperation Council of Arab States of the Persian Gulf and the benevolence of the West healthy, s 'embarked on a campaign of bombings against kinetic almost the poorest Arab nation in the world in the name of "democracy."
But this nonsense is nothing compared to what will follow.
The head of European diplomacy, Federica Mogherini harmless as a stale cannolo seems slightly worried. She noticed that the bombing of hospitals and "deliberate targeting and destruction of private homes, educational institutions and basic infrastructure can not be tolerated."But nothing more is to be expected that a simulated outrage on the part of a European Union (EU) unfazed when neo-Nazi Kiev are exactly the same in the Donbass.The Red Cross and Russia, for their part, require at least a temporary cease-fire to allow the arrival of humanitarian aid. But humanitarian relief are not worthy of al-Saud lineage. After two weeks of "shock and awe" operation in Saudi, there are already 560 dead and 1700 injured, including dozens of children, and the countdown has just begun.The Empire of chaos clings to the Strait of Bab-el-MandebBomb Iran? Not now, the new trend is to bomb Yemen. But the idea of ​​bombing Iran may return.The big Pentagon chief Ashton Carter confirmed last week that "all options are on the table" even if Iran's nuclear agreement between Iran and Group 5 + 1 is finally negotiated in June. So to be quite clear, the Pentagon says that nuclear talks are only a noise that will not prevent an additional small war in the Middle East.Needless to add that "the West" civilized did not flinch an ankle when his Saudi offspring began to apply a shock scenario warrior and dread the poor Arab nation. No resolution of the UN Security Council. Not even warrant an Arab League already completely discredited. Who cares? After all, the "chaos of Empire" did the same thing again and again with impunity.The idea that the Strait of Bab-el-Mandeb, which is also crucial that the Suez Canal on the strategic plan, to be taken by the Houthi rebels did speak many hysterical. Nonsense. Whatever the al-Saud family does, the agenda barely hidden the "chaos of Empire" is to never lose control of the Strait of Bab-el-Mandeb, Gulf of Aden and the ArchipelagoSocotra.
A man reacts as he inspects damage of building caused by air strike in Sanaa
A man reacts as he inspects damage of building Caused by air strike in Sanaa
These territories are part of what we call the "Chokepointistan" where the misleading terminology of the "war against terrorism" (Global War on Terror (GWOT)) is used to justify all kinds of wars around these bottlenecks energy. US Think Tankland is more direct, meticulously following US naval deployments. It is what it is; a "freedom of navigation" Orwellian masking an aggressive strategy to eliminate the geopolitical enemy, namely Iran, Russia, China and all these countries together.

The "Chokepointistan" [=choke] is everywhere just look at the strait Bab-el-Mandeb, where the Saudis are trying to reassert their positions (with an impact on Yemen but also on Somalia, Eritrea, the Ethiopia and the Republic of Djibouti etc ...); the Strait of Hormuz (regarding Iran); not to mention the Straits of Malacca (in the case of China), the Panama Canal (in respect of Venezuela), the channel provided in Nicaragua (in the case of China), the Korea Strait, the Taiwan Strait , the Kuril Islands and the last checkpoint, but not least, the Baltic Sea.The vast armada enragedSaudi Arabia knows that the Houthi rebels can not control the Straits Bab-el-Mandeb, not to mention that Washington would never allow it. What infuriates the Saudis on houthie Yemen rebellion supported by Tehran that it may encourage brilliant ideas of rebellion among the Shiite majority in the eastern provinces of Saudi Arabia where almost all its oil is located.This is the point where the patterns of Saudi Arabia to go to war coincided with the paranoia of the empire to prevent Iran, Russia and / or China to establish a possible strategic presence in YemenStrait Bab-el-Mandeb, which overlooks the Gulf of Aden.Again, we see that the largest Pentagon chief Ashton Carter insists that "The United States supports the Arab plan to create a unified military force to meet the increasing security threats in the Middle East, and the Pentagon will work with these Plans where interests coincide US and Arab. " Translation: we gave the green light for our offspring to maintain "stability" in the Middle East.There is also a spoke in the wheels; possible rapprochement between Washington and Tehran, assuming that the nuclear deal is negotiated. For the Obama administration, which describes itself as "Do not do stupid things," the nuclear deal will be their only success in their foreign policy. Moreover, without Iran, there is no serious fight against Daesh / Islamic state "Syria and Iraq."None of it soothes highly paranoid Saudis who quickly assembled a great armada enraged - 100 combat aircraft, 150,000 soldiers, described by the US as a "coalition" of ten countries. Without even opening the United Nations Charter, the Saudis immediately called Yemen-fly zone.
Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif addresses during a joint statement with EU foreign policy chief Mogherini in Lausanne
Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif addresses Pendant joined statement with US foreign policy chief Mogherini in Lausanne
The routine bombing of residential complexes, refugee camps and factories are built harmoniously with the internal repression Saudi Arabia. After the descent of the armed forces with great fanfare tanks and assault rifles firing sight Al-Awamia in the east;Shiites may think twice before showing against the slaughter in Yemen.

In short, the extremely wealthy Saudi regime, corrupt and medieval, is engaged in a war against its own people. Always inflexible Wahhabi imams are busy sowing anti-Shia and anti-Iranian fever everywhere; they are "apostates" of the doctrine of takfiri, while the Iranians are ungrateful "Safawis" - a rather pejorative reference to the Safavid dynasty of the sixteenth century. It is crucial to remember that the Islamic State treats Shiites and Iranians in the same way.But forget that such a fact can be reported by the Western media.The General and SheikThe al-Saud family says it wants to reinstall the exiled government of Yemeni President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi. Or, in the words of the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir, "defend the legitimate government of the country."Saudi hagiographers paid by the royal family again frantically told a confrontational history of Sunnis and Shiites who ignores the breathtaking complexity of the Yemeni tribal society. This ridiculous Saudi defense paves the way for a ground war; a long ground war, bloody and extremely expensive.And it becomes, as expected, even more absurd.General Martin Dempsey, Chief of Staff of the armies of the United States, was recently interviewed during a meeting of the Senate Armed Services Committee on the question of whether he knew "a major Arab ally who greeted Daesh" His response:"I know the major Arab allies that fund."Translation: the US government not only does not endorse nor punishes his "allies" (the real fun is to penalize Russia), but also providing logistical support and "non-lethal" to a "coalition" that gently fight a Islamic State financed by it. This is not a joke; that's how the war against terror always comes back to haunt us.This is becoming more and more curious when we Dempsey on the same page as Sheik Nasrallah, Hezbollah Secretary General. In his crucial speech, Sheikh Nasrallah has the most extensive and accurate explanation of the origins and ideology of the Islamic state / Daesh. And here he speaks of Yemen, Saudi Arabia and Iran.So what we have is the "empire of chaos" that "runs in the background" in the war in Yemen and also de facto "runs in the background" in the fight against the state Islamic / Daesh. Those who perform the most difficult tasks Iraqi militias backed by Tehran.The hidden agenda is always, what else, chaos;either through the "Syrak" either inside Yemen. With an added bonus; while Washington is engaged in negotiations on the nuclear deal with Tehran, it simultaneously strengthens an alliance against Tehran, using the al-Saud family.Vietnam in the desertThe al-Saud family sincerely hope that Pakistan will take no prisoners, providing combat aircraft, ships and many ground troops to his war. Riyadh treats Islamabad as a vassal state.But a joint session of the Pakistani parliament decides to stay neutral, so eventually they withdraw from the alliance and will not participate in the war.It is quite revealing to know what happened when the channel's most popular private Pakistani television brought together representatives of all major political parties to explain his position. Soon they reached a consensus; Pakistan should be neutral; act as a mediator; and not send troops unless there is a "real threat" to the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina, which are far from the case.The al-Saud family actively gives tons of money to Salafi preachers and Deobandis to advertise their war, which includes a visit to Riyadh the Ulema delegation. Groups based in Pakistan who trained with al-Qaeda and fought the Taliban in Afghanistan have lost support after they were financed by the Wahhabi fanatics.
Followers of the Houthi movement attend a protest against the Saudi-led air strikes in Sanaa
Followers of the Houthi movement expects protest Against the Saudi-led air strikes in Sanaa

Meanwhile, on the front lines, a true reversal could occur while the Houthi rebels shine a missile on the other side of the border headed to Saudi oil installations. But after all the paris are open, and the possibility that long-range missiles have been pre-positioned becomes quite credible.

This scenario would mean that a foreign intelligence agency draws the al-Saud family in its own Vietnam quagmire in Yemen with a rain of missiles that could hit its pumping stations and oil fields, which could have catastrophic consequences for the global economy. It is crucial to remember that the vast armada assembled by rabid Riyadh represents less than 32% of world oil production. This can not end well.

Everyone in Yemen has an AK-47, not to mention rocket launchers and hand grenades. This area is a paradise for guerrillas. The story goes into detail at least 2000 years of fierce fighting between local tribes and various foreign invaders. The majority of Yemenis hate al-Saud family and cries for vengeance; the majority follows that Houthi rebels announced the end of February, while the al-Saud family and the United States were planning to devastate Yemen.

The rebellion houthie includes Sunnis and Shiites, totally discrediting the Saudi story. When they captured the Office of the Yemeni National Security, which was in fact an implementation of the CIA, Houthi rebels found a large number of secret documents "compromised" Washington Yemeni chapter on the ghostly "war against Terror ".Regarding the Saudi army is a joke. In addition, it employs a large contingent, as you guessed, Yemeni soldiers.

Operation "Storm decisive," another war ignorant of international law in the Pentagon's style has already plunged Yemen in two scourges of civil war and humanitarian disaster. The remains of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and especially the Islamic State / Daesh (which happily hate Houthi Shiite rebels and all) could not be happier. "The chaos of Empire" not afraid of anything; most common is chaos, the better for the Long War defined by the Pentagon (against terror).

There are more than five years, I wrote that Yemen was the new Waziristan. Now it is also becoming a new Somalia. And soon, it could become the Vietnam of the al-Saud family....